Republicans and Open Carry: A Masterclass in "Spot the Difference" We’ve all seen the images. A group of camouflage-clad men, predominantly white, standing on the steps of a state capitol with AR-15s slung over their shoulders. In the headlines that follow, they are often described as “patriots,” “concerned citizens,” or “Second Amendment activists.” The rhetoric from the right is usually a full-throated defense of their constitutional right to bear arms—a fundamental liberty that must be protected at all costs. But then, an image like the one above appears. A Black woman, hair natural and defiant, fist raised in the air, a tactical vest cinched tight, and a rifle held with practiced ease. Suddenly, a strange "confusion" starts to set in among conservative commentators. If the Second Amendment is an absolute, color-blind right, then this woman is the ultimate embodiment of American liberty. She is the "well-regulated militia" in the flesh. Yet, when we l...
Republicans and Open Carry: A Masterclass in "Spot the Difference" We’ve all seen the images. A group of camouflage-clad men, predominantly white, standing on the steps of a state capitol with AR-15s slung over their shoulders. In the headlines that follow, they are often described as “patriots,” “concerned citizens,” or “Second Amendment activists.” The rhetoric from the right is usually a full-throated defense of their constitutional right to bear arms—a fundamental liberty that must be protected at all costs. But then, an image like the one above appears. A Black woman, hair natural and defiant, fist raised in the air, a tactical vest cinched tight, and a rifle held with practiced ease. Suddenly, a strange "confusion" starts to set in among conservative commentators. If the Second Amendment is an absolute, color-blind right, then this woman is the ultimate embodiment of American liberty. She is the "well-regulated militia" in the flesh. Yet, when we l...